nemo mk2 wrote:
define the difference between a fighter and a martial artist...
If training [and particularly cross training] in the martial arts doesn't necessarily make you into a fighter, in spite of having a shared skill set and level of conditioning, then what does? What is the difference between the two and how would YOU define yourselves?
this is something i think about quite a bit, especially with my issues around confrontation that i may or may not still have.
i think that fighters in martial arts are yer boxers, thai fighters, UFC etc, they tend to be more brutal, going for the knockout, drawing blood, doing damage etc,
there is a lot of emphasis and expectation on that aspect too for the spectator.
of course all this is still "martial arts"...
but for me, martial arts is about learning all of the other aspects associated with martial arts, humbleness, self control, patience, mastering all these amazing things that your body can do that you don't even know about yet.
it all may centre around fighting, but these things are the most important, otherwise it is JUST fighting.
i think the difference is as such:
i have a friend of a friend who is a born and bred football hooligan, he is a "hard ba***rd and can fight already, he does'nt need to learn how to defend himself, he has no desire to be enlightened (which makes me wonder why he has joined our wing chun class) he just wants to fight better.
it's fair to say he has "fighting spirit"
in martial arts class you may spend ten years learning "martial skills", but without "fighting spirit" you'll probably just get tw***ed anyway when it hits the fan.
like the proverbial black belt who walked into a nightclub feeling proud as punch, only to get knocked out in one punch by a drunken imbecile with coordination of a one legged cat trying to bury turds on a frozen pond.
as a result, i fell it is important for people (me especially) to be honest with themselves about who and what they are and what they want to be, and what they expect from their martial art.